Titles sometimes fall flat or don’t
quite represent the book that follows. However, the title of Clare Best second
full collection, Each Other (Waterloo Press, 2019), certainly does so, as the
poems are riven with duality.
First of all, the book is divided into
two sections. Moon House evokes the dynamics in relationships between two people:
wife and husband, daughter and mother, mother and son, son and father, grandson
and grandfather, and in doing so it seems explicitly autobiographical. Each
Other, however, appears far more fictionalised, portraying the evolution of an
imagined couple.
Secondly, while the two sections might
initially give the impression of being separate entities, the crux of this
collection lies in their implicit dialogue. In order to get to grips with the
terms of that conversation, it’s worth comparing their technical qualities.
Let’s start with Moon House. In this
section, Clare Best captures and treasures moments. She’s explicitly personal,
as in the ending to My father-in-law embraces my son:
…The love between you overwhelms the
dream.
You both bristle with light,
I’ve never seen love as bright as
this.
I must wake up and find my son, tell
him
how much his grandfather loves him.
The love, the love. I will
hurry now.
Love isn’t just invoked in these
lines. Instead, it becomes a chant, being defined and redefined.
There are many instances throughout
Moon House where Best, far from fearing this abstract noun, meets it head-on
and wrestles with its potential connotations. As a consequence, Each Other (the
collection’s second section) then comes as a shock.
In Each Other, most of the poems are
driven by anecdote and observation. One excellent example can be found in the
opening lines of What they depend on…
She believes in miracles, education,
cotton sheets.
He
prefers wool socks, a tidy desk, blue cheese.
She swears by scent, candles,
unexpected sex.
He
likes promises, weekends, knowing what’s next…
The casual reader might well be
disconcerted by the juxtaposition of these two approaches in a single volume. Nevertheless,
further inspection of the collection gradually reveals its cohesive nature. In
fact, the poet’s skill is such that she is convincingly able to employ contrasting
techniques and then let them play off each other (sic).
To explain this concluding statement, let’s
go back to that afore-mentioned implicit dialogue between the two sections. Similarity
and difference, definition and description, the abstract and the concrete, are all
harnessed, inviting us to join Clare Best in her grappling with one specific term
that also just happens to be this excellent book’s final word: love.